FOC Haveman and Carpenter violated inocent parties first amendment right

July 22, 2009 court order
Parenting Time Coordinator must establish a regular review of each parties complaints about the other, create a rational, safe place for each party to discuss joint legal issues or any other changes necessary in their parenting time and empower parties to handle their own communication without dependency upon a third party.
The parties must, prior to bringing any problems concerning joint legal custody, communication with the minor child, and other similar complaints to the courts attention, first seek the assistance of FOC Haveman through this process, who will attempt to facilitate a mutual resolution of these matters.
FOC Haveman shall set a schedule, regularly meet with the parties to review complaints, help the parties to develop buffers and boundaries and assist the parties to development of effective communication.
The Kent County FOC shall review each report of FOC Haveman when submitted and make appropriated recommendations as to any modifications of order, or other measures that need to be taken by the Court, as needed.
It is the Courts intention and the understanding of the parties, that the parenting coordination with FOC Haveman as set forth above shall supersede, until further order of the Court, any further motions to the court to resolve the issues facing the parenting time coordinator, and that each of the parties must utilize this process for their dispute resolution in this regards.

FOC HAVEMAN: IS NOT COMPLIANT WITH THE JULY 22, 2009 ORDER OF JUDGE CARPENTERS. FOC HAVEMAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED Plaintiff BRUNS HISTORY OF ABUSE AND HAS TODAY IGNORED THE FAMILY VIOLENCE ACT WHICH CLEARLY STATES THE PARTY WITH A HISTORY OF ABUSE IS NOT TO HAVE CUSTODY OF THE MINOR CHILD. FOC HAVEMAN AS A MANDATED REPORTER OF CHILD ABUSE AND A LICENSES SOCIAL WORKER IS NOT ACTING IN GOOD FAITH. FOC HAVEMAN IS ACTING AS AN AGENT OF Plaintiff BRUNS. FOC HAVEMAN IS IGNORING THE JUDGES ORDER FOR JOINT LEGAL CUSTODY. FOC HAVEMAN ATTACKS Defendant BRUNS. FOC HAVEMAN ATTACKS Defendant BRUNS ABILITY TO READ, FOC HAVMAN ATTACKS DENISE BRUNS INTELLEGENCE. JULIE HAVEMAN IGNORES THE CPS NYELA BOLDEN'S TESTIMONY HER REPORT OF ABUSE TO THE MINOR CHILD BY Defendant BRUNS WAS FALSE. FOC HAVEMAN IS MANDATED TO REMOVE MY GIRL FROM THE ABUSERS HOUSE AND RETURN HER TO THE HOME WHERE SHE HAS REPEATED ASKED TO LIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Remove Corrupt Chief Justices through out America

Remove Chief Justice Margaret Marshall

WEB NEWS RELEASE -- December 2004

A Bill of Address (click for sample) to remove Massachusetts Chief Justice Margaret Marshall from office was submitted today to the state legislature.

The Bill of Address is sponsored by Massachusetts State Representative Philip Travis of the Fourth District Bristol County, State Representative Emile Goguen of the Third District Worcester County and Mr. Edward "Zed" McLarnon of Malden.

Mr. McLarnon, a forensic investigator with 23 years experience, has been investigating the Massachusetts judiciary for nine years. His investigation revealed evidence that discloses that Chief Justice Marshall and her judiciary have unconstitutionally "legislated from the bench" laws and legal precedents that benefit judges and are used by "legal industries" such as the divorce and abuse industries to separate children from their fathers and seniors from their families - for money.

McLarnon has physical evidence that several Massachusetts courts illegally edit court-hearing tapes, doctor dockets, alter court files and hide court files. McLarnon has complained of these illegal acts by judges and court personnel to the Superior Court, the Judicial Conduct Committee and Margaret Marshall's Supreme Judicial Court where his complaints were covered up by judicial fraud, misrepresentations and stonewalling.

When challenged as to what "laws" the Massachusetts judiciary legislated from the bench, McLarnon responded "judges have legislated their own Absolute Immunity to the point where they are immune from civil suits even when they knowingly and willfully base their judicial rulings on fraud." McLarnon alleges that this "law" allows judges to operate 'above the law' as an aristocracy and makes second-class citizens of the rest of us. The judiciary hides this law under the title "public policy."

McLarnon further stated "Margaret Marshall and the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court re-wrote the Anti-SLAPP Law to immunize social workers who submit fraudulent clinical evaluations that condemn people they have never met or interviewed, and mothers who lie in court to unlawfully gain custody of children. "State representative Philip Travis, a co-sponsor of this bill, is one of the authors of the Anti-SLAPP Law and understands how Marshall's SJC stood the original intent of the Anti-SLAPP Law on its head, which was to protect private citizens from frivolous countersuits from large corporations that they sue.

"When a father walks into Family Court, he is the only one in the courtroom without immunity to commit perjury and fraud," continued McLarnon. "Absolute Immunity allows the judge to commit fraud, the Anti-SLAPP precedence set by the SJC allows the mother to commit perjury and fraud and her social workers to submit fraudulent clinical evaluations." As a result of this kangaroo court, the father loses custody of his children and is ordered to pay child support - of which the state makes matching federal funds.

McLarnon is the founder/president of CASK, a coalition comprised of victims who have lost family members as a result of judges having court hearing tapes illegally edited to support their fraudulent rulings. McLarnon claims the divorce and abuse industries use these illegal tactics to remove custody of children for federal funds and seniors to drain their estates.

"When judges make law the legislative process is undermined and we no longer have a representative republic," stated McLarnon.