carpenter is corrupt kidnapps our children under the color of law, places children in the custody and care of those substaniated child abuser.

reluctant pro se litigant and victim of extreme pattern and practice of judicial bias and malicious prosecution that started with the Court denying Defendant a 15 (fifteen) year stay-at-home mother, legal representation paid for by the plaintiff who was the only source of income over the fifteen year marriage. An Original Action in the Supreme Court pursuant to (Lapeer Co Clerk v Lapeer Circuit Judges, 465 Mich 559 [2002]).’ as provided for by MCR 9.122(A) (2), to request this “Court to exercise its Power of Superintending Control” over the lower court. Defendant prays this “Court to exercise its Power of Superintending Control over the wrong doings of Plaintiff’s attorney and the trial court judge that participated in a pattern and practice of fraud upon the court, perjury and false attorney affidavits by Plaintiff and his attorney that usurped the judicial process, and judicial orders that exceeded jurisdiction, and judicial appointees that willfully made false claims and allegations that continue to destroy Defendant’s relationship with her daughter, the non-abusive parent, and awarded custody the daughter to the Plaintiff who has a documented history of abuse and sexual molestation of the daughter, and despite the fact that before he suborned the judge, Daniel J. DeWitt, Psy. D physiological recommendation states: states: “ I would not have a problem with this man continuing as custodial parent so long as he is held responsible to continue with family counseling as long as that is warranted by the emotional needs of the children.” Based on some undue influence the lower court awarded the plaintiff custody. (Exhibit attached)

The lower court’s orders were based on a fraudulent affidavit in violation of: 18 USC - U.S. Code - Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedure (January 2004) and MCR 2.114(a). Attorney Irons knowingly submitted the fraudulant affidavit and Carpenter allowed the only parent without a history of abuse experience abuse by the attorney and judges in 17th Circuit Court Family Division.

This child wants to come home Carpenter believes in a higher power. She better believe in a higher power child abuse is a crime and hell is forever.

17th Circuit Court Judge Carpenter is under investigation by the Judical Tenure Commission

The Judge Carpenter and Appeal Justices besmirched the Defendant's D Bruns character with fraudulent allegations that her home was an unstable, unsatisfactory environment for her child/ren to live and that their relationship was unhealthy enmeshment. The trial judge Nanaruth Carpenter allowed Plaintiff to testify of fraudulent allegation of abuse and neglect of the minor child yet denied Attorney Catherine Appel to redress the Plaintiff testimony. The parties were instructed by the trial judge Nanaruth Carpenter that anything prior to the last custody order of November 9, 2009 would not be allowed into evidence. The trial judge Carpenter attacked the Defendant's D Bruns character with the allegations of filing a false report of sexual misconduct. The trial Judge Carpenter did not, would not consider and ignored the Defendant's D Bruns firsthand knowledge of the Plaintiff's written confession of the sexual misconduct.

The Michigan Child Protection Law Act of 1975 states that sexual misconduct includes but is not limited to any contact or inter-action between a child and an adult.

The Trial Judge Carpenter aimed at protecting the Plaintiff , ignored and giving him wide latitude for presently fraudulently reporting child abuse of the minor child.

The Court (Judge Carpenter) is mandated by Judicial Canon # 1, 2 & 3 “to enforce a high standard of conduct so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved.” The conduct throughout this case of Judge Carpenter, Attorney Irons and Child Protective Services investigator Bolden and the Plaintiff, come into question regarding honesty, trustworthiness and committing fraud upon the court under the color of law.

Furthermore the U.S. Supreme Court states any party who aids and abets commits crimes against the U.S Government and treason. The Trial Judge(Carpenter) and Attorney Irons ignored the CPS investigator Nyela Bolden's testimony and retraction of her most recent fraudulent report. Attorney Catherine Appel presented the proper evidence which was ignored by Judge Carpenter a violation of the:

VICTIMS’ RIGHTS AMENDMENT (C) Section 71.004 for the U.S. Constitution which states: the court shall not appoint as sole managing conservator a party who has a history of committing family violence.

The Trial Judge is not a mental health professionals, therefore not qualified to diagnose a psychological disorder. In the lower court hearings, three psychological evaluations were entered into evidence which state the Defendant D Bruns is qualified to provide appropriate parenting to her children. By ignoring evidence the trial Judge Nanaruth Carpenter has chosen to remain completely silent about the Plaintiffs long documented history of abuse, neglect and abandonment of the minor children. This gives approval to the Trial Judge Carpenter excusing the Plaintiff for sexual misconduct while ignoring the best interest of the minor child. The Trial Judge Carpenter is mandated be the fact finder and to to make the best interest of the minor child a priority and report violations of professional misconduct.

I D Bruns found Carpenters findings were against the great weight of the evidence.

Supporting Evidence:

1. Carpenter willfully omitting pertinent facts of the case which documented the history of abuse and abandonment of the minor child/ren.

2. Trial Judge Carpenter as a fact finder is to preform due diligence reviewing the file, which would have revealed the Plaintiff history of abuse to the minor children. For the trial judge Carpenter allowing the minor child to remain in the custody of the Plaintiff is a clear violation of the best interest factors.

3. Judge Carpenter ignored the retraction of the CPS investigtor Bolden's report which made the change of circumstances and redress custody were void.

4. The trial judge Carpenter awarded the Appellant sole legal and physical custody when the Plaintiff abandoned his parental role of the children. Custody was later again awarded to the Plaintiff false allegations which CPS stated were unfounded.

Facts of the Case:

Plaintiff’s conviction of Non Aggravated Assault: Pleaded guilty to domestic violence of the Appellant with 1 year probation (police report attached) .

Temporary Order of Custody: Given to Plaintiff on 12/14/1002. Plaintiff was substantiated for child abuse on 1/19/2002. (see transcript page 12)

Plaintiff and New Spouse: Reported to Belding Police for child endangerment of inhaling helium to stage of passing out. (see attached)

Wyoming Police Department: Plaintiff named as perpetrator in seven domestic violence reports (see attached).

Plaintiff abandoned his parental role from 2002-2004: Plaintiff abandoned his parental role.

5/21/06 (see attached)

Civil Family Dispute: Plaintiff locked minor children out of his home during visitation. (see attached)

Domestic Assault 12/03/06: Plaintiff substantiated of child abuse 12/8/06.

December 11, 2007 Appellee violated court order: Plaintiff took minor child to Appellant’s residence and had child enter the home. (see transcript page 16)

Plaintiff submitted illegally gained evidence: Plaintiff taped private phone conversations without consent of Defendant D Bruns and minor child. The tapes were provided to the Guardian Ad Litem and Friend of the Court.

Testifies at Trial 2007: Plaintiff testified both incidents of abuse to the boys were pretty insignificant. (see transcript page 50 and attached)

Defendant had sole custody of minor child: In 2008, Plaintiff violated custody order by changing the minor child’s school, sending minor child to camp and failing to enable phone conversations between Plaintiff and the minor child.