Sunday, January 23, 2011

CPS violates their mandates pursuant to MCL 722.638, failure to protect

MCL722.638. Requires CPS/ DHS to file a petition when DHS determines a preponderance of evidence of child abuse or neglect of a child or sibling of a child that includes one or more of the following:
Abandonment of a young child.

Battering torture or other severe physical abuse.
Michigan Child Protection Law also requires DHS to request termination of parental rights if the parent is responsible for any abuse or neglect listed above (under MCL 722.638) or if the parent failed to protect the child from someone else who abuses them in ways listed above (under MCL 722.638)

Pursuant to this request kent county department of CPS/DHS Supervisor Robert Farr, Amy Middlestat, Investigators: Nyela Bolden, Jacklyn Lee FOC Julie Haveman, Denise Kimbrel, Cara Lemon being fully aware the father was substantiated of child abuse to son Oliver 1/19/01 and son Josiah 12/8/06.
On 11/9/04 17th circuit court Judge Carpenter found the father abandoned his parental role.


Kent County CPS and FOC being fully advised have wantonly disregarded the clear and convincing evidence have failed to perform their duties pursuant to and executed their duties according to MCL 722.638.

As the non custodial parent who has abused none of her children.

Request CPSGDHS execute a petition pursuant to MCL 722.638.

Nyela Bolden testified 8/8/08 to the facts stated above were slander and liable to secure federal funds for CPS/DHS.

Failure to petition for termination of Fathers parental rights pursuant to MCL 722.638 would clearly establish a tort claim failure to protect the minor child from further abuse.

Sincerely.
D Bruns
3442 Buchanan
Grand Rapids, MI 49548

1 comment:

  1. Thanks so much for the post we are going through the same thing with roles reversed (father was an innocent nonabusive parent) in Genesee County with Judge F. Kay Behm and Referee Carolyn Bougner deciding this case. Court has been advised of and received the evidence ignored it and gave the child to the mother when no hearing should have even been held and the best interest factors were never considered.

    ReplyDelete