trial judge Carpenter failed to separate fact from accusation and twisted the evidence

In conclusion the Michigan Court of Appeals, it is difficult to understand why the COA would state that because the same trial judge had presided over the proceedings since 2000 and because the Plaintiff had testified to mental, verbal and physical abuse, that without actual factual proof, the Court of Appeals would then agree to uphold the trial judge’s opinion. The Plaintiff has a documented record of abuse and according to law, that alone gives no rights to custody of the minor child. This cannot be disputed. The Defendant has no long term proven record of abuse and has been proven to be fit to parent. CPS Investigator Nyela Bolden testified her report was erred and fraudulent. (Transcript of complete trial available at 17th Circuit Court Clerks Office)
This complaint is effective, because the transcript and evidence are riddled with false accusations by all parties toward the Defendant. The Trial Judge Carpenter failed to separate fact from accusation and twisted the evidence in favor of the Plaintiff. Clarke v Wayne Circuit Judge, 193 Mich 33; 159 NW 387 (1916)